News
The Raging ‘‘Third World War’’: Why Covid-19 May Defeat the Contractual Rights of Force Majeure
Written by: Sola Adeyemo
No one envisaged it. Nobody saw it coming. The rage of the Covid-19 has been quite phenomenal in all ramifications. The big bull is here; the all-powerful Coronavirus and its deadly fangs have unleashed untold fear, terror and hardship on all of us. From the Americas to Asia, from Europe to Africa and from Australia to Oceania; Covid-19 has swept through the seven continents of the world like a deadly hurricane. Right now, it’s only because the Antarctica is aloof and not habitable for human beings, that’s why this daredevil cannot touch it.
It’s an understatement to say that this Wuhan-born virus has wreaked untold havoc on our world and its devastating effects may take the whole world about five years to mop up, according to experts. But what is it…what is Coronavirus or Covid-19 as it’s been renamed lately?
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that are known to cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Medical experts have affirmed that the virus can be transmitted from person to person, usually after close contact with an infected patient, for example, in a household, workplace, or health care facility.
Stockphoto: pexels.com
Coronavirus outbreak has negatively impacted on global economy in a very shocking way and world renowned economists, groups, rating agencies, business schools and top ivory towers have all been taken aback by the ravaging powers of this raging storm.
According to World Economic Forum, “The shock to the global economy from COVID-19 has been both faster and more severe than the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) and even the Great Depression. In those two previous episodes, stock markets collapsed by 50% or more, credit markets froze up, massive bankruptcies followed, unemployment rates soared above 10%, and GDP contracted at an annualized rate of 10% or more. But all of this took around three years to play out. In the current crisis, similarly dire macroeconomic and financial outcomes have materialized in just three weeks.
Earlier this month, it took just 15 days for the US stock market to plummet into bear territory (a 20% decline from its peak) – the fastest such decline ever. Now, markets are down 35%, credit markets have seized up, and credit spreads (like those for junk bonds) have spiked to 2008 levels. Even mainstream financial firms such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley expect US GDP to fall by an annualized rate of 6% in the first quarter, and by 24% to 30% in the second. US Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin has warned that the unemployment rate could skyrocket to above 20% (twice the peak level during the GFC)”.
Well, it must be said that one thing saw the coming of Coronavirus and has told the world to prepare for its attendants effects on contractual agreements and business engagements – it’s named FORCE MAJEURE.
To any layman out there, a force majeure could be broken down is simple terms to mean ‘‘contractual clauses which alter parties’ obligations and/or liabilities under a contract when an extraordinary event or circumstance beyond their control prevents one or all of them from fulfilling those obligations.
Depending on their drafting (which differs from one country to the other), such clauses may have a variety of consequences, including: excusing the affected party from performing the contract in whole or in part; excusing that party from delay in performance, entitling them to suspend or claim an extension of time for performance; or giving that party a right to terminate. We talk principally below about parties being excused from performance entirely, but many of the principles are common to these different varieties of clause.
Stockphoto: pexels.com
In English and Scottish law, force majeure is a creature of contract and not of the general common law. It therefore differs from some other legal systems where force majeure is a general legal concept and where courts may declare that a particular event, such as a pandemic like Covid-19, is a force majeure event.
There have been instances in the United States where force majeure situations/clauses have played significant roles in litigations arising from breach of contractual agreements by a party or the other. It’s also a known fact that the issue of force majeure is universal but its interpretations and implementations may differ from countries to countries.
Coming back home, one would like to examine the clause of force majeure and how same can be summoned or provoked in this present economic realities occasioned by the Covid-19 pandemic.
It must be said that Covid-19 would naturally affect a larger percentage of our sectors in Nigeria, especially the financial sector. And one isn’t sure if players in the sector are fully prepared to abide by the tenets of the force majeure clause in this present circumstance the world albeit Nigeria has found itself. I woke up in the wee hours today asking myself how many insurance companies/brokers, banks,mortgage firms,high-street lenders and other players in this sectors would without grudge succumb to the force majeure clause when the chips are down. It’s a million dollar question!
At this juncture, it’s pertinent to note that Guaranty Trust Bank recently surprised industry watchers and its customers by showing empathy to via its 90-day moratorium that seeks to ease the burden of loans and other credit facilities’ repayments off its customers. Kudos must go to GT Bank for leading the way in this regard by freezing loan repayments for three months for its customers. The bank has in so doing has allayed the fears of debtors who are right now worried if their loan agreement(s) is covered by Covid-19 pandemic. This is impressive! And I think other commercial banks must take a cue from this innovative and thoughtful bank.
Now, worried by what the law of the land says about force majeure in this environment, I spoke to a lawyer friend who’s an erudite legal luminary of international repute and former gubernatorial aspirant in the State of Osun – Dr. (Prince) Ayoade Adewopo – about the looming battle between Covid-19 and force majeure (with emphasis on Nigeria). My friend who holds a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree and a masters in International tax law from Universities in the US and Switzerland reckons it’s a very simple situation. According to Adewopo , ‘’the principle of force majeure differs from one country to the other, but be that as it may, any duly signed contractual agreement has to be followed to the letter by the agreed parties and this includes the clause of force majure’’.
Personally, most contractual agreements which I’ve seen or have been party to normally adopt an approach to defining the type of event which may, depending on its impact, relieve a party from contractual liability:
A larger percentage of the contract papers list specific events which may include events such as war, terrorism, earthquakes, hurricanes, acts of government, plagues or epidemics. Now, I think where the term epidemic, or pandemic, has been used in any contractual agreement that will clearly cover Covid-19. And the latter will have to submit to the superior contractual powers of FORCE MAJEURE.
According to another seasoned legal practitioner, Mr. Efe Ize-Iyamu, FORCE MAJEURE may not win the battle between it and Covid-19 if we further break it down. Sounding a note of caution, he says… ‘’the downside of force majeure is this; even if the Coronavirus pandemic or any pandemic for that matter is a type of event covered by the force majeure clause , the next question we may want to consider is the impact on the affected party’s ability to perform its contractual obligations as it is common for force majeure clause(s) to specify the impact that the event or circumstances in question must have in order for the clause to be triggered.
Ize-Iyamu further adds that “the Covid-19 crisis leading to lockdown in Lagos, Ogun and the FCT (in Nigeria) will necessarily lead to disruptions in contractual agreements, particularly in terms of delivery time, in many sectors . This disruption will trigger various disputes largely due to failure to perform or delayed performance of contractual obligations. For example questions will arise as to whether this crisis constitutes a force majeure event. This dispute should not necessarily end up in litigation, it is important that lawyers advise their clients to renegotiate (where possible) those contractual rights impacted by this crisis”.
And to make matters worse for contractual agreements which are yet to run their full course before the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic, the World health Organization (WHO) yesterday made a shocking pronouncement during a routine world press briefing by saying the Covid-19 is just starting – the world body adds definitively that the virus is going to be here with us for a long time. This invariably means that the “third world war” between Covid-19 and the force majeure continues even as countries like Japan, the US and a host of other countries in the EU are mulling the idea of dragging China to the Hague for inflicting untold hardship on the world’s inhabitants. Hmmm! I give up – it’s complex.
In the meantime, good luck to our world. And let everyone just stay safe!
Sola Adeyemo is a Writer,Public Affairs Analyst & Media Entrepreneur.
He’s the President of Lagos State Online Media Publishers(LASOMP) and the Coalition of Online Publishers in West Africa(COPUWA).
Email: solaadeyemo10@gmail.com



News
I Delivered $15m Agency Cash To Ex-NIMASA DG Akpobolokemi, EFCC Witness Tells Court
A prosecution witness, Captain Ezekiel Bala-Agaba, testified in a Lagos Federal High Court on Thursday, that he personally delivered $15 million in cash to former NIMASA DG, Patrick Akpobolokemi.
The witness, Bala-Agaba, a former Executive Director of Maritime Safety, Shipping Development and Marine Operations at NIMASA, made the disclosure while testifying before Justice Ayokunle Faji of the Federal High Court in Lagos.
Captain Agaba, who appeared as the 15th prosecution witness, told the court that funds meant for pipeline surveillance were withdrawn from NIMASA’s accounts, converted into dollars, and handed over to Dr Akpobolokemi.
According to him, the money was taken to a Bureau de Change, which converted it into $15 million before the cash was delivered to the NIMASA office on Burma Road, Apapa, Lagos.
He said he subsequently took the money to the office of the then Director-General.
“The money was sent to a Bureau de Change, which later brought the dollar equivalent to our office at Burma Road, Apapa, Lagos. I asked my Personal Assistant, Ekene Nwakuche, to carry the bag and follow me to the Director-General’s office,” he told the court.
The witness explained that he collected the bag from his aide before entering the office.
“When we got to the door of the Director-General’s office, I collected the bag from him and asked him to wait outside. I then personally delivered the sum of $15 million to the Director-General.”
The witness was initially a defendant in the case but later opted to testify for the prosecution.
While being led in evidence by prosecuting counsel, Suleiman Suleiman, he explained the chain of command within NIMASA and how financial approvals were processed in the agency.
According to him, the Director-General is the overall head of the agency and issues instructions to directors, who then implement policies in line with the NIMASA Act.
He told the court that he chaired the agency’s Intelligence Committee, which was responsible for certain security-related operations.
“As chairman of the committee, I oversaw its activities and reported directly to the Director-General, Dr. Patrick Akpobolokemi,” he said.
During the proceedings, the witness was also shown a document containing a letter from Access Bank to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) detailing transactions in NIMASA’s accounts between 2013 and 2015.
When asked how much money he took to the former Director-General, Agaba replied: “$15 million.”
After listening to the testimony, Justice Faji adjourned the matter until April 22 and 23 for cross-examination of the witness.
The EFCC had in December 2015 arraigned Dr. Akpobolokemi and seven others before the court on a 30-count charge bordering on conspiracy, fraudulent conversion of funds and money laundering.
Those charged alongside the former NIMASA boss include, Warredi Enisuoh, Governor Juan, Ugo Frederick, Timi Alari, as well as Alkenzo Limited and Penniel Engineering Services Limited.
They pleaded not guilty to the offences.
The anti-graft agency alleged that the defendants conspired to divert funds running into over N1.15 billion under the guise of providing security intelligence in Nigeria’s maritime domain.
According to the EFCC, the NIMASA Intelligence Committee allegedly received N1,153,000,000 between December 2013 and July 2015.
Investigations further revealed that several companies contracted to execute the intelligence operations were either unregistered or lacked the capacity to perform the services, while some were allegedly linked to the defendants.
The prosecution also alleged that the defendants nominated or owned many of the companies used to execute the contracts.
One of the charges stated that the defendants conspired to commit offences punishable under the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2012.
News
CBN Bars Chronic Loan Defaulters from Accessing New Banking Services
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has issued a directive to all financial institutions to immediately restrict certain banking services for large-ticket borrowers with non-performing loans (NPLs).
This move is aimed at strengthening credit discipline and protecting the stability of the Nigerian financial system following a rise in the industry’s NPL ratio to approximately 7%, exceeding the regulatory 5% threshold.
This order is specifically targeted at large-ticket obligors.
The CBN issued the directive in a circular to banks on Monday.
The latest instruction comes almost a week after the CBN asked financial institutions to stress test.
It is uncertain if the two directives are connected or what may have triggered the loan-related instruction, but the apex bank said it furthers its mandate to protect Nigeria’s financial system.
“In furtherance of its mandate to promote a sound financial system, protect depositors, and enhance prudential compliance within the banking sector, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) hereby directs all banks to restrict non-performing large ticket obligors, whose activities pose systemic risk to the financial system, from accessing specified banking services,” the circular reads in part.
“Any large-ticket obligor with a non-performing facility recorded in the CRMS and/or any licensed private credit bureau shall not be granted additional credit facilities. For the purpose of this restriction, credit facilities include loans and other forms of direct credit.
“In addition, such obligors shall not be granted banking facilities or contingent liabilities such as bankers’ confirmations, letters of credit, performance bonds, or advance payment guarantees.”
News
Makinde Only In PDP Because He’s Not Seeking Re-election – Otitoju
Babajide Kolade-Otitoju, the Director of News at TVC News, recently stated that Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde would likely have defected from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) if he was still serving his first term.
Otitoju stated this on Friday on TVC’s ‘Breakfast Show’.
He described the National Convention of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in Ibadan last November as a mere waste of time.
“People must show good judgment at a critical phase. What was the point of having that convention? Two courts told you not to go ahead but you went ahead.
“I may not be a fan of former Senate President Bukola Saraki but if he says something that makes sense, I will be the first to admit it. He made sense when he said let’s go for caretaker. What’s the point of not listening to him?
“Later you will be shouting that the ruling party is behind your crisis, meanwhile you are the architect of your own misfortunes. You created this problem.
“If Makinde were in his first term, he would have fled like the dancing governor because his second term would have been in danger,” Otitoju said.
-
News1 day ago2027 Shakeup: 12 Lawmakers Defect To APC, ADC
-
News2 days agoWorld War III Fears: Zelensky Reveals Warning To Trump
-
News1 day agoTerror Surge: Tinubu Demands Results from Security Chiefs
-
News2 days agoTensions Rise As Makoko Communities Vow To Resist Relocation Order
-
News16 hours agoCorruption Probe: Court Grants ICPC Access To Data On El-Rufai’s Seized Gadgets
-
News20 hours agoBeyond My Wildest Dreams: Disu Opens Up During Handover From Egbetokun
-
News13 hours agoMakinde Only In PDP Because He’s Not Seeking Re-election – Otitoju
-
News12 hours agoCBN Bars Chronic Loan Defaulters from Accessing New Banking Services
