Connect with us

News

The Raging ‘‘Third World War’’: Why Covid-19 May Defeat the Contractual Rights of Force Majeure

Published

on

Written by: Sola Adeyemo

No one envisaged it. Nobody saw it coming. The rage of the Covid-19 has been quite phenomenal in all ramifications. The big bull is here; the all-powerful Coronavirus and its deadly fangs have unleashed untold fear, terror and hardship on all of us. From the Americas to Asia, from Europe to Africa and from Australia to Oceania; Covid-19 has swept through the seven continents of the world like a deadly hurricane. Right now, it’s only because the Antarctica is aloof and not habitable for human beings, that’s why this daredevil cannot touch it.  

It’s an understatement to say that this Wuhan-born virus has wreaked untold havoc on our world and its devastating effects may take the whole world about five years to mop up, according to experts. But what is it…what is Coronavirus or Covid-19 as it’s been renamed lately?

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that are known to cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Medical experts have affirmed that the virus can be transmitted from person to person, usually after close contact with an infected patient, for example, in a household, workplace, or health care facility.

Stockphoto: pexels.com

Coronavirus outbreak has negatively impacted on global economy in a very shocking way and world renowned economists, groups, rating agencies, business schools and top ivory towers have all been taken aback by the ravaging powers of this raging storm.

According to World Economic Forum, “The shock to the global economy from COVID-19 has been both faster and more severe than the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) and even the Great Depression. In those two previous episodes, stock markets collapsed by 50% or more, credit markets froze up, massive bankruptcies followed, unemployment rates soared above 10%, and GDP contracted at an annualized rate of 10% or more. But all of this took around three years to play out. In the current crisis, similarly dire macroeconomic and financial outcomes have materialized in just three weeks.

Earlier this month, it took just 15 days for the US stock market to plummet into bear territory (a 20% decline from its peak) – the fastest such decline ever. Now, markets are down 35%, credit markets have seized up, and credit spreads (like those for junk bonds) have spiked to 2008 levels. Even mainstream financial firms such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley expect US GDP to fall by an annualized rate of 6% in the first quarter, and by 24% to 30% in the second. US Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin has warned that the unemployment rate could skyrocket to above 20% (twice the peak level during the GFC)”.

Well, it must be said that one thing saw the coming of Coronavirus and has told the world to prepare for its attendants effects on contractual agreements and business engagements – it’s named FORCE MAJEURE.

To any layman out there, a force majeure could be broken down is simple terms to mean ‘‘contractual clauses which alter parties’ obligations and/or liabilities under a contract when an extraordinary event or circumstance beyond their control prevents one or all of them from fulfilling those obligations.

Depending on their drafting (which differs from one country to the other), such clauses may have a variety of consequences, including: excusing the affected party from performing the contract in whole or in part; excusing that party from delay in performance, entitling them to suspend or claim an extension of time for performance; or giving that party a right to terminate. We talk principally below about parties being excused from performance entirely, but many of the principles are common to these different varieties of clause.

Stockphoto: pexels.com

In English and Scottish law, force majeure is a creature of contract and not of the general common law. It therefore differs from some other legal systems where force majeure is a general legal concept and where courts may declare that a particular event, such as a pandemic like Covid-19, is a force majeure event.

There have been instances in the United States where force majeure situations/clauses have played significant roles in litigations arising from breach of contractual agreements by a party or the other. It’s also a known fact that the issue of force majeure is universal but its interpretations and implementations may differ from countries to countries.

Coming back home, one would like to examine the clause of force majeure and how same can be summoned or provoked in this present economic realities occasioned by the Covid-19 pandemic. 

It must be said that Covid-19 would naturally affect a larger percentage of our sectors in Nigeria, especially the financial sector. And one isn’t sure if players in the sector are fully prepared to abide by the tenets of the force majeure clause in this present circumstance the world albeit Nigeria has found itself. I woke up in the wee hours today asking myself how many insurance companies/brokers, banks,mortgage firms,high-street lenders and other players in this sectors would without grudge succumb to the force majeure clause when the chips are down. It’s a million dollar question!

At this juncture, it’s pertinent to note that Guaranty Trust Bank recently surprised industry watchers and its customers by showing empathy to via its 90-day moratorium that seeks to ease the burden of loans and other credit facilities’ repayments off its customers. Kudos must go to GT Bank for leading the way in this regard by freezing loan repayments for three months for its customers. The bank has in so doing has allayed the fears of debtors who are right now worried if their loan agreement(s) is covered by Covid-19 pandemic. This is impressive! And I think other commercial banks must take a cue from this innovative and thoughtful bank.

Now, worried by what the law of the land says about force majeure in this environment, I spoke to a lawyer friend who’s an erudite legal luminary of international repute and former gubernatorial aspirant in the State of Osun – Dr. (Prince) Ayoade Adewopo – about the looming battle between Covid-19 and force majeure (with emphasis on Nigeria). My friend who holds a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree and a masters in International tax law from Universities in the US and Switzerland reckons it’s a very simple situation. According to Adewopo , ‘’the principle of force majeure differs from one country to the other, but be that as it may, any duly signed contractual agreement has to be followed to the letter by the agreed parties and this includes the clause of force majure’’.

Personally, most contractual agreements which I’ve seen or have been party to normally adopt an approach to defining the type of event which may, depending on its impact, relieve a party from contractual liability:

A larger percentage of the contract papers list specific events which may include events such as war, terrorism, earthquakes, hurricanes, acts of government, plagues or epidemics. Now, I think where the term epidemic, or pandemic, has been used in any contractual agreement that will clearly cover Covid-19. And the latter will have to submit to the superior contractual powers of FORCE MAJEURE.

According to another seasoned legal practitioner, Mr. Efe Ize-Iyamu, FORCE MAJEURE may not win the battle between it and Covid-19 if we further break it down. Sounding a note of caution, he says… ‘’the downside of force majeure is this; even if the Coronavirus pandemic or any pandemic for that matter is a type of event covered by the force majeure clause , the next question we may want to consider is the impact on the affected party’s ability to perform its contractual obligations as it is common for force majeure clause(s) to specify the impact that the event or circumstances in question must have in order for the clause to be triggered. 

Ize-Iyamu further adds that “the Covid-19 crisis leading to lockdown in Lagos, Ogun and the FCT (in Nigeria) will necessarily lead to disruptions in contractual agreements, particularly in terms of delivery time, in many sectors . This disruption will trigger various disputes largely due to failure to perform or delayed performance of contractual obligations. For example questions will arise as to whether this crisis constitutes a force majeure event. This dispute should not necessarily end up in litigation, it is important that lawyers advise their clients to renegotiate (where possible) those contractual rights impacted by this crisis”.

And to make matters worse for contractual agreements which are yet to run their full course before the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic, the World health Organization (WHO) yesterday made a shocking pronouncement during a routine world press briefing by saying the Covid-19 is just starting – the world body adds definitively that the virus is going to be here with us for a long time. This invariably means that the “third world war” between Covid-19 and the force majeure continues even as countries like Japan, the US and a host of other countries in the EU are mulling the idea of dragging China to the Hague for inflicting untold hardship on the world’s inhabitants. Hmmm! I give up – it’s complex.

In the meantime, good luck to our world. And let everyone just stay safe!

Sola Adeyemo is a Writer,Public Affairs Analyst & Media Entrepreneur.

He’s the President of Lagos State Online Media Publishers(LASOMP) and the Coalition of Online Publishers in West Africa(COPUWA).

Email: solaadeyemo10@gmail.com

News

Oyo 2027: Adelabu Quits As Power Minister To Focus On Guber Race

Published

on

By

The Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu has formally resigned from his position in the Federal Government to pursue his governorship ambition in Oyo State.

In a resignation letter dated April 22, 2026, and addressed to the President, Adelabu stated that his resignation will take effect on April 30, 2026, to enable him to focus on his governorship ambition in Oyo State.

The letter, routed through the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, stated that he was stepping down with “a deep sense of honour and profound gratitude.”

He wrote, “I write with a deep sense of honour and profound gratitude to formally tender my resignation as the Honourable Minister of Power of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. This resignation is to take effect on 30th April 2026, in order to allow sufficient time for a smooth and orderly handover of responsibilities.”

Adelabu thanked the President for the opportunity to serve, describing his appointment as a privilege.

He said, “Your Excellency, I remain sincerely grateful for the privilege and confidence you reposed in me by appointing me to serve our great nation in this capacity.

“It has been a rare honour to contribute to national development under your leadership and to play a role in advancing reforms in the power sector—one of the most critical foundations of Nigeria’s industrial growth and economic transformation.”

The former minister said his resignation was to enable him focus fully on his governorship ambition in Oyo State, citing provisions of the amended electoral law.

He added, “My decision to step down is informed by my intention to focus fully on my gubernatorial ambition in Oyo State. This aspiration, which dates back to 2016 during my service as Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, ultimately led to my voluntary resignation from the Central Bank in 2018 in order to pursue the same goal.”

“In line with the provisions of the Amended Electoral Act 2026, which preclude political office holders from contesting elections, I consider it both appropriate and necessary to resign at this time.”

Adelabu’s exit marks a major political development ahead of the next electoral cycle, particularly in Oyo State, where he is expected to contest the governorship election.

Continue Reading

News

Wale Edun, Musa Dangiwa Resigned Voluntarily, Not Sacked – Presidency

Published

on

By

The Presidency has clarified that Wale Edun (former Finance Minister) and Ahmed Musa Dangiwa (former Housing Minister) voluntarily resigned from their positions and were not sacked by President Tinubu.

In a statement released this evening April 22, presidential media aide, Bayo Onanuga, said that contrary to public opinions, Wale Edun resigned on health grounds while Dangiwa also tendered his resignation and thanked the President for the opportunity given him to serve in the Federal Executive Council.

Onanuga stated that Edun, who clocked 70 on Monday and has battled recent ill health, fittingly submitted his resignation letter on his birthday, thanking the President for the opportunity to serve Nigeria.

“It has been a pleasure and privilege to serve your administration and the Renewed Hope Agenda, Under your leadership, Nigeria has emerged stronger, more resilient and more internationally respected. I wish you and the administration every success in the future” he wrote

Onanuga stated that on Tuesday, before the Office of the Secretary of the Government of the Federation announced his departure from the Cabinet, Edun paid a valedictory visit to the President at the Villa and held an hour-long discussion with the president and then left to focus on his private businesses.

The presidential aide stated that President Tinubu has expressed deep appreciation to Edun and Dangiwa for their dedicated service and significant contributions to the administration’s economic reform programme and wished them continued success in their future endeavours.

‘’In the same vein, the President has urged the new Minister of Finance, Taiwo Oyedele, to consolidate ongoing reforms and advance the administration’s fiscal and economic objectives with renewed focus, discipline, and innovation.

President Tinubu will shortly send the ministerial nominee for housing, Muttaqha Rabe Darma, also from Katsina, like Dangiwa, to the Senate for confirmation” the statement concluded

Continue Reading

News

Unity Bank, Experts Advocate Green Investment, Climate Innovation To Drive Economic Resilience

Published

on

By

Nigeria’s retail lender, Unity Bank Plc, alongside leading climate innovation experts, has called for increased investment in the green economy and the adoption of frontier technologies as critical pathways to driving economic resilience and reducing the impact of climate change on vulnerable populations across Africa.

The call was made during a thought-provoking webinar hosted by the Bank to commemorate this year’s Earth Day, themed “The True Cost of Climate Change and Who Pays?”. Climate experts and stakeholders convened to examine the human, economic, and institutional costs of climate change, while spotlighting practical solutions to address its growing impact.

In his opening remarks, Unity Bank’s Head of Strategy and Innovation, Ibukun Coker, emphasised the urgency of addressing climate risks from both a societal and business perspective.

He said: “Climate change is no longer a distant or abstract challenge. It is an existential threat with direct consequences for individuals, businesses, and economies. At Unity Bank, we recognise the role institutions must play in incorporating sustainability in project financing, supporting businesses and promoting solutions that build resilience in communities where we operate.”

The webinar featured Chinwe Udo-Davis, Founder and CEO of Instollar, and Oluwatosin Ajide, Programme Manager at the Nigeria Climate Innovation Centre, both of whom provided insights into the drivers of climate change and the pathways to mitigation and adaptation.

Speaking during the session, Udo-Davis highlighted the disproportionate burden which climate change places on underserved communities and the need for inclusive solutions.

“The true cost of climate change is not evenly distributed. Communities with the least resources are often the most affected, whether through energy poverty, environmental degradation, or limited access to sustainable alternatives. Addressing this imbalance requires intentional investment in clean energy solutions that are both accessible and scalable.”

Ajide underscored the importance of coordinated, system-wide approaches in tackling climate challenges, particularly through innovation and policy alignment.

“Climate change is fundamentally a structural problem, and its solution requires a paradigm shift: from innovation and policy to financing and implementation. Stakeholders must work collaboratively to drive solutions that are sustainable and inclusive.”

The session also explored emerging opportunities in climate technology, renewable energy, and ecosystem financing, reinforcing the role of innovation and cross-sector collaboration in building long-term resilience.

By hosting the webinar, Unity Bank continues to demonstrate its commitment to advancing sustainability-focused dialogue and supporting initiatives that promote responsible growth and environmental stewardship.

The initiative underscores the Bank’s broader strategic focus on environmental sustainability as well as its commitment to financial inclusion.

Continue Reading

Trending