News
CBN Slashes Electronic Transfer; ATM Withdrawal Charges
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has reviewed downward electronic transfer and ATM fees as well as card maintenance fees.
The new charges were contained in the latest Guide to Charges by Banks and Other Financial Institutions just released by the CBN
According to the CBN, bank customers will now pay N10 for electronic transfers below N5,000, and N25 for electronic transfer between N5,000 and N50,000. Only electronic transfer above N50,000 will attract N50 charge.
Previously, bank customers pay N50 charge for electronic transfers below N500,000.
Further, the CBN in the new Guide to Bank Charges slashed charges for cash withdrawal via Other bank’s ATM to “maximum of N35 after the third withdrawal within the same month” from “N65 after the third withdrawal within the same month”.
The CBN also removed Card Maintenance Fee (CAMF) on all cards linked to current accounts, a maximum of one Naira per mille for customer induced debit transactions to third parties and transfers or lodgments to the customers’ account in other banks on current accounts only,
Commenting on the new charges, Director, Corporate Communications, CBN, Isaac Okorafor explained that the current NIP charges apply to use of Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD), purchase with cash-back will attract a charge of N100 per N20,000 subject to cumulative N60,000 daily withdrawal. Also, for cards linked to savings account, a maintenance fee has been reduced to a maximum of N50 per quarter from N50 per month amounting to only N200 per annum instead of N600.
Furthermore, he hinted that there will be no more charges for reactivation or closure of accounts such as savings, current and domiciliary accounts while status enquiry at the request of the customer (like confirmation letter, letter of non-indebtedness and reference letter) will now attract a fee of N500 per request.
On Current Account Maintenance Fee (CAMF), the Guide expressly stated that this would be applicable only to current accounts in respect of customer-induced debit transactions to third parties and debit transfers/lodgments to the customer’s account in another bank. It emphasized that CAMF is not applicable to Savings Accounts.
According to the Director, the CBN carried out the review of the Guide, which also prescribes charges permissible for Other Financial Institutions and non-bank financial institutions, in order to align with market developments.
To guard against excess, unapproved or arbitrary charges by banks and other financial institutions, the Guide stipulates a penalty of N2,000,000 per infraction or as may be determined by the CBN from time to time for financial institutions that breach any provision of the guide. The Guide also emphasized that failure by any bank to comply with CBN’s directive in respect of any infraction shall attract a further penalty of N2,000,000 daily until the directive is complied with or as may be determined by the CBN from time to time.
Consequently, the CBN directed banks to log every complaint received from their customers into the Consumer Complaints Management System (CCMS) in addition to generating a unique reference code for each complaint lodged, which must be given to the customer. Failure to log and provide the code to the customer, it added, amounts to a breach and is sanctionable with a penalty of N1,000,000 per breach.
The charges prescribed in the Guide were arrived at after extensive consultations with stakeholders and is expected to enhance flexibility, transparency and competition in the Nigerian banking industry.
This Guide, which replaces the Guide to Charges by Banks and Other Financial Institutions issued in 2017, takes effect from January 1, 2020, and maybe reviewed from time to time to reflect changes in the business environment.
The CBN, therefore, urged financial services providers and their customers alike to acquaint themselves with the provisions of the Guide and be properly guided accordingly.
News
SANWO-OLU MOURNS POPULAR ISLAMIC CLERIC, SHEIKH MUYIDEEN AJANI BELLO
Lagos State Governor, Mr. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, has mourned the passing of the renowned Nigerian Muslim scholar and preacher, Sheikh Alhaji Muyideen Ajani Bello.
Governor Sanwo-Olu described the death of Sheikh Bello, who died at the age of 84 on Friday, as a great loss to the country, particularly the Muslim community.
In a statement issued on Friday by Mr. Gboyega Akosile, his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Governor Sanwo-Olu said the late Sheikh Bello left an indelible mark on the Muslim community and his followers across the world, and he would be sorely missed.
Governor Sanwo-Olu also condoled with the deceased’s family, Muslim faithful, friends and Muslim community across the country over the demise of the renowned Islamic cleric.
He said: “Sheikh Alhaji Muyideen Ajani Bello lived a fulfilled life. He dedicated his life to the service of the people and the propagation of Islam. His death is a great loss, but we are consoled by the good life that he lived and the legacy that he left behind.
“On behalf of my family, the people and the Government of Lagos State, I commiserate with the immediate family, friends, associates and the entire Muslim community over the passing of elder statesman and Islamic scholar, Sheikh Alhaji Muyideen Ajani Bello, who passed away at the age of 84 years
“The late Sheikh Alhaji Muyideen Ajani Bello would be remembered for his great sacrifice and commitment to the propagation of Islam, honesty, dignity, harmony and moral development of our people.
“I pray that Allah grants the repose of the late Sheikh Alhaji Muyideen Ajani Bello Aljannah Firdaus and grant the deceased family and loved ones the fortitude to bear the irreparable loss.”
News
Zenith Bank Emerges ‘Bank Of The Year Nigeria In The Bankers Awards 2024
Zenith Bank Plc has emerged as ‘Bank of the Year, Nigeria’ in The Banker’s Bank of the Year Awards 2024.
The award, which was announced by The Banker Magazine, Financial Times Group, United Kingdom, during the awards ceremony held in London on December 4, 2024, is in recognition of the bank’s strong management, sound business model and strategy, and approach to sustainability and ESG banking practices.
The Banker’s ‘Bank of the Year’ accolade is among the most coveted and widely regarded award in the banking industry. Often contested by the world’s leading financial institutions, the winners span across Africa, Asia-Pacific, Central & Eastern Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, North America and Western Europe.Commenting on the award, the Group Managing Director/Chief Executive of Zenith Bank Plc, Dame (Dr.) Adaora Umeoji, OON, said “We are delighted and honored to have been recognized as the Bank of the Year, Nigeria in The Banker’s Bank of the Year Awards 2024.
This award is a testament to the unwavering trust and loyalty of our esteemed customers, the unparalleled leadership and guidance of the Board and Management as well as the hard work and dedication of our staff. It also reflects our bank’s steadfast commitment to delivering excellent services to our customers and contributing to the growth and development of the Nigerian economy.
We will continue to invest in innovative technologies, expand our range of products and services, and maintain our commitment to exceptional customer service in order to sustain our position as Nigeria’s Number One Bank.” She lauded the Founder and Chairman of Zenith Bank Plc, Jim Ovia, CFR, for his visionary role in laying the foundation for a reputable, dominant and globally recognised financial institution known for innovation, superior performance, and the creation of premium value for all stakeholders. In November 2024, Zenith Bank commissioned its Paris Branch following the granting of the final approval by France’s banking regulator, the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (ACPR).
This is part of the bank’s global expansion strategy, and its commitment to serving clients wherever their businesses are around the world.Zenith Bank has continued to earn numerous awards, with this latest accolade coming on the heels of several recognitions.
These include being recognised as the Number One Bank in Nigeria by Tier-1 Capital for the fifteenth consecutive year in the 2024 Top 1000 World Banks Ranking, published by The Banker Magazine. The Bank was also awarded the Bank of the Year (Nigeria) in The Banker’s Bank of the Year Awards for 2020 and 2022; and Most Sustainable Bank, Nigeria in the International Banker 2023 and 2024 Banking Awards.
Further recognitions include Best Bank in Nigeria for four years from 2020 to 2024 in the Global Finance World’s Best Banks Awards and Best Commercial Bank, Nigeria for four consecutive years from 2021 to 2024 in the World Finance Banking Awards. Additionally, Zenith Bank has been acknowledged as the Best Corporate Governance Bank, Nigeria, in the World Finance Corporate Governance Awards for 2022, 2023 and 2024 and ‘Best in Corporate Governance’ Financial Services’ Africa for four consecutive years from 2020 to 2023 by the Ethical Boardroom.
The Bank’s commitment to excellence saw it being named the Most Valuable Banking Brand in Nigeria in the Banker Magazine Top 500 Banking Brands for 2020 and 2021, and Retail Bank of the Year for three consecutive years from 2020 to 2022 as well as Bank of the Year, 2023 at the BusinessDay Banks and Other Financial Institutions (BAFI) Awards.
The Bank also received the accolades of Best Commercial Bank, Nigeria and Best Innovation in Retail Banking, Nigeria, in the International Banker 2022 Banking Awards. Zenith Bank was named Bank of the Decade (People’s Choice) at the ThisDay Awards 2020, Bank of the Year 2021 by Champion Newspaper, Bank of the Year 2022 by New Telegraph Newspaper, Best in MSME Trade Finance, 2023 by Nairametrics and Most Responsible Organisation in Africa 2021 by SERAS Awards.
News
VAT Discourse And Tinubu’s Pan-Nigerian View
By Salamah Akindeko
If we agree with the utilitarianist view that one thing a leader must do is consider making choices that produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people, then Nigerians should commend President Bola Tinubu for choosing to break away from the past by elevating common national interest to a new level.
And this did not start when he became president as this leadership trait had been demonstrated in various spheres he had held sway. His antecedents speak for him.
In May last year, President Bola Tinubu reinforced this view that he is for all. He pledged to govern Nigeria impartially and in accordance with the Constitution as well as the rule of law. He went further to task the citizenry to embrace national affinity and brotherhood. To observers who look at things dispassionately, this avowed commitment of the President has largely reflected in how he has been running his administration since he took over the reins of government.
President Tinubu, in his inaugural speech, among other things, said: “Today, let us recommit our very selves to placing Nigeria in our hearts as the indispensable home for each and every one of us regardless of creed, ethnicity, or place of birth…The South must not only seek good for itself but must understand that its interests are served when good comes to the North. The North must see the South likewise,” he had said.
One area where President Tinubu has again shown fidelity to his commitment is on the discourse around sharing formula for Value-Added Tax (VAT). Let me use this opportunity to correct erroneous impression that the North is against the president’s tax bills. The disagreement voiced by some northern leaders is on the proposed adoption of derivation model/approach to sharing of VAT revenue. VAT is only a portion of the bills. For emphasis, the four bills currently being scrutinized by the parliament seek to overhaul and modernise the country’s fiscal landscape in a way that brings benefits to the citizens and the three tiers of government.
Revealing President Tinubu’s position at an interactive session with members of the parliament recently, chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Zacch Adedeji, said the president is concerned that Lagos and three other states go home with 70% of VAT revenue monthly, with Lagos (the president’s state) collecting the lion’s share of 42%.
“Today, I just signed the data on VAT [sharing] for October. Lagos will take 42% of the VAT[revenue], Rivers will take 16%, Oyo State will take 5.2%, and the FCT will take 10%. Go and check; these three states [and the FCT] are taking more than 70%. Why? Because those are the places where the head offices of those companies.…states like Borno and Bauchi collect only 0.32% and 0.4% of VAT proceeds respectively, compared to Lagos’ 42%.
“Any day I sign off on the data, I don’t feel like I am a Nigerian because this is not what we represent in our prayer as a nation. That is why, in the wisdom of Mr. President, we need to change this structure,” Adedeji told the lawmakers.
Listening to Adedeji, one would know that President Tinubu is a fair and just leader. He could have directed that status quo be maintained when some northern leaders apparently misjudged his intention on the subject. After all, Lagos and two other states will continue to cash out, while majority of the states will be left with what they currently get from the pool. So, the current attempt at reengineering the tax system is a big sacrifice for which Tinubu should be commended.
While there has been opposition to an aspect of the bills from the North, it is salutary that there are equally voices of reason who have studied the Bills and have seen the goodness of the heart of President Tinubu. A pro-North former Kaduna senator, Shehu Sani, while commending the Bills, said they are not in any way anti-North. According to the fiery critic,” It’s in fact economically beneficial and fair to all parts. People should keep aside sentiments and read the Bills carefully. It is a comprehensive and bold move to harmonise and simplify tax administration and streamline its operations and enforcement “
The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abass, at the interactive session, located the controversy surrounding the VAT aspect of the Bills rightly, describing it as a reflection of their importance. For him, such debates are healthy and necessary in a democracy.
Apart from the fact that these Bills will when passed into law and assented to make states to look inwards and rethink, the issues of imbalance, fairness would be addressed by promotion of equitable distribution of the VAT revenue. These are some of the grey areas the reforms seek to address.
That noted, the total benefits of the bills should have been considered by those raising issues on VAT. People forget easily the confusing overlap of multiple tax laws. For example, why should small businesses pay taxes to the three tiers of government, a development that makes taxation unnecessarily complex? Why should there be multiple laws dealing with almost similar aspects of taxes in such a way that compliance with tax obligation is made difficult for taxpayers? Why should Nigeria not have a law that regulates cryptocurrency operations within its territory? Why in 2024 should we as a country be operating under laws that were made in 1939 (Stamp Duty Act), laws that are archaic and unfit for businesses in this modern time? The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has to give way for the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) in order to accurately reflect the agency’s comprehensive services.
If there is any state that should be bellyaching over the proposal on restructuring of VAT sharing formula, it should be Lagos State. If there is any region whose voice should be loudest against the bills, it should be the South-West. But Lagos and the South-West understand where the President is coming from and have strong faith in his capacity to act in the best interest of the country.
With the town hall meeting held by Channels TV on the subject and with the kind of end-of-discussion explanation provided by Mr Taiwo Oyedele, who chaired the presidential committee on the matter, all opposition should stop henceforth. The National Assembly is there to look into the concerns raised by a few people and seek out ways to iron out those issues with vitiating the general objective of the Bills. It will not serve the interest of those speaking against the Bills if Lagos, which is going to be the biggest loser in the proposed VAT regime, sees reason to challenge either the status quo ante or the proposal. It will be recalled that in the immediate past administration, the issue of VAT sharing was litigated. A political option was sought to prevent the matter from running its full course.
Salamah Akindeko, a finance enthusiast, writes from Ila, Osun State