Connect with us

News

Emirship Tussle: I Don’t Care If I’m Removed Again – Sanusi

Published

on

Sanusi remained focused on the bigger picture, emphasizing the importance of unity and historical continuity within the Kano Emirate.

In a candid and extensive interview with Sun Newspaper, Emir Muhammadu Sanusi II, the former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), declared his willingness to face removal again if it ensures the preservation of the Kano Emirate as a unified entity.

Sanusi attributed the current crisis within the Emirate to the immediate past administration in Kano State, led by former Governor Abdullahi Umar Ganduje.

Sanusi, reinstated as the 16th Emir of Kano following a Federal High Court ruling, emphasized the historical and cultural significance of the Kano Emirate, which has existed for over a millennium. “For me, even now that I am here, only God knows how long I will be here. I can die tomorrow.

“Another governor can come tomorrow and say that he has removed me, it doesn’t matter. But I am happy if he does not touch the emirate,” Sanusi stated.

He expressed his gratitude to the current government and the Kano State Assembly for restoring the emirate to its original state.

“I am happy that I will not leave a history that it was during my time that these 1000 years of history was destroyed. So, I am grateful to this government, grateful to this Assembly that they have corrected that, that we have the emirate restored to what it was and Insha’Allah that when I die or when I leave, the person who inherits will inherit what we had,” he explained.

Sanusi’s comments followed a Federal High Court decision that invalidated the Kano State government’s repeal of the Kano Emirates Council Law 2024. This law had led to the removal of Alhaji Aminu Ado Bayero as the Emir of Kano and the creation of four new emirates—Bichi, Rano, Karaye, and Gaya—by Ganduje’s administration.

The court’s ruling directed all parties to maintain the status quo ante, effectively reinstating Sanusi as the Emir.

Human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, criticized the court rulings, describing them as “highly erroneous” and lacking constitutional justification under Sections 251 and 254 (C). Despite these legal controversies, Sanusi remained focused on the larger picture, stressing the importance of the Kano Emirate’s unity and historical continuity.

Sanusi recounted the long-standing unity within the Kano Emirate, contrasting it with other regions where new emirates were created due to ethnic and religious diversity. He argued that Kano, a largely homogeneous society, did not require such divisions. “Nobody asked for new emirates. So, what we are dealing with is a situation where somebody divided us,” he remarked.

He elaborated on the damage inflicted by the previous administration’s restructuring, comparing it to the arbitrary colonial borders drawn by Europeans. “You don’t create emirs for people. Somebody who, for one thousand years, has never been under you, somebody now decrees that this is your king. How?” Sanusi questioned, particularly criticizing the creation of the Bichi Emirate, which was historically governed by a village head.

Sanusi highlighted the complex history and the cohesive fabric of the Kano Emirate, criticizing the arbitrary creation of new emirates and kingmaker positions. “You’re dealing with Kano. You’re not dealing with me. It’s not about me as a person. It’s about our history, our culture,” he stressed.

Providing a historical background, Sanusi explained that the Kano Emirate predated Nigeria and even the Sokoto Jihad. “The Kano Emirate was not created by the Nigerian Constitution. The Emirate existed before Nigeria. The Kano Emirate existed before the Sokoto Jihad. Even Uthman Danfodio did not create the Kano Emirate,” he said.

He noted that the division of the Emirate disrupted centuries-old traditions and governance structures. “This is the right they claimed for themselves for their contribution to the Jihad. How does somebody now take Mr. A and say I’m creating a fifth kingmaker in Mr. A’s family? What right do you have to join those four? How? What did you do that gives you the right to be a kingmaker?” Sanusi asked.

Sanusi underscored the importance of understanding the historical and cultural context of the Kano Emirate, warning against arbitrary changes that could damage its legacy. “Now, just like the British partitioned Africa, you divided what had existed over a period of time. People need to understand what this government did, because people don’t understand what that law was and the kinds of damage it did to our history’s fabric,” he said.

Despite the political and legal turmoil, Sanusi remains committed to preserving the unity and integrity of the Kano Emirate. “It’s about the system, not about me or any individual,” he affirmed, reflecting his dedication to the Emirate’s continuity and historical significance.

 

News

Ignore Fake February 2 Sit-at-Home Order, IPOB Lawyer Tells South-East Residents

Published

on

By

A human rights lawyer and lead counsel for the Indigenous People of Biafra, Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, has urged South-East residents to completely ignore what he described as a “fraudulent” sit-at-home order allegedly scheduled for Monday, February 2, 2026, by a faction of the group.

Recall that the pro-Biafran group, through its spokesman Emma Powerful, had directed a sit-at-home on February 2 across the region in solidarity with traders at the Onitsha Main Market.

Powerful said the total shutdown in Biafraland is a direct, peaceful, and unified response to the actions of Anambra State Governor, Prof. Chukwuma Soludo, who ordered the closure of the Onitsha Main Market for one week.

But in a counter statement released on Saturday, Ejiofor said the source behind the directive, operating under the guise of “Emma Powerful,” has been compromised and is acting against the collective interest of Ndi-Igbo.

He insisted that IPOB has formally and decisively distanced itself from the false sit-at-home order and directed Ndi-Igbo to go about their lawful activities without fear.

The statement read in part: “Once again, the well-worn theatre of misinformation has opened its curtains, this time with a particularly lazy script and an insultingly predictable cast.

“Late yesterday, a report was widely circulated alleging that a total lockdown of Ala-Igbo had been ordered under the guise of a sit-at-home directive purportedly issued by ‘Emma Powerful,’ slated for Monday, February 2, 2026.

“Let it be stated clearly, unequivocally, and without ambiguity: this directive is fake, a phantom, a calculated falsehood.

“Upon careful inquiry and diligent verification, especially considering the delicate and hard-won calm presently returning to our homeland, it became glaringly obvious that the so-called ‘Emma Powerful’ platform has been fatally compromised.

“It has been hijacked by vested interests whose business model thrives on fear, disruption, extortion, and the cynical exploitation of vulnerable communities.

“The peaceful global movement of the IPOB has formally and decisively disowned this fabricated publication, categorically distancing itself from the false sit-at-home order and directing Ndi-Igbo to go about their lawful and normal activities without fear.

“Going forward, the message from IPOB is unmistakable: any publication attributed to ‘Emma Powerful’ should be treated with extreme suspicion, if not outright contempt.

“Frankly, one cannot but express astonishment, bordering on disbelief, that at such a critical juncture, when relative peace is cautiously resurfacing in Ala-Igbo, anyone would recklessly circulate information capable of reopening wounds and inviting criminal infiltration.

“History has taught us, at unbearable cost, what happens when fake directives fall into the hands of violent opportunists masquerading as enforcers.

“It is therefore no longer sufficient to merely advise our people to ‘ignore’ publications from this source. The time has come for greater clarity and firmness. The platform known as ‘Emma Powerful,’ in its current corrupted state, has positioned itself as an adversary to Ala-Igbo’s peace, progress, and collective well-being.”

According to Ejiofor, the peaceful global movement must go further by publicly and definitively explaining why this source has become unreliable, compromised, and hostile to the collective interest of Ndi-Igbo. Silence, ambiguity, or polite distancing, he said, only leaves room for further abuse.

“A masquerade that dances with fire should not be mistaken for a messenger of truth,” the statement concluded.

Continue Reading

News

Joint Task Force Crushes Terrorist Cells In North East, Heavy Weaponry Seized

Published

on

By

In recent operations across the North East, troops of the Joint Task Force Operation HADIN KAI (OPHK) have neutralized scores of terrorists and recovered a significant cache of arms and ammunition.

Lieutenant Colonel Sani Uba, Media Information Officer, Headquarters Joint Task Force (North East) in a statement said intelligence has confirmed the killing of JULAIBIB, a top ISWAP commander operating within the Gujba axis of the Timbuktu Triangle, during an encounter around Kimba, Damboa LGA of Borno State, on 30 January 2026.

According to the statement, the elimination of the terrorist leader has thrown ISWAP elements in the area into disarray, with several fighters reportedly neutralised during the operation.

In a related operation, troops of OPHK, working in collaboration with the Civilian Joint Task Force, neutralised 3 terrorists during a well-coordinated ambush between Ngazalgana and Lamusheri communities in Borno State.

It said the operation followed credible intelligence on insurgent movements in the area, as troops laid an ambush along the identified route and engaged the terrorists with effective firepower, resulting in the neutralisation of 3 insurgents, while others fled with gunshot injuries.

The statement said troops recovered two AK-47, adding that the operation forms part of sustained efforts to deny terrorists freedom of movement and degrade their operational capabilities across the Theatre.

It said troops also recorded multiple successes in Adamawa State, adding that on 29 January, 2026, troops responded swiftly to a distress call from Barama community, Mubi North LGA, foiling an armed robbery attempt. Two armed robbery suspects attempting to attack a student of the Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, were arrested. One suspect sustained a gunshot wound to the thigh while attempting to confront the troops and was evacuated to the Federal Medical Centre, Mubi, for treatment.

The suspects were subsequently handed over to the Nigeria Police for further investigation. Items recovered include 3 cutlasses, 2 laptops, 4 mobile phones, and one power bank.

 

Continue Reading

News

Appeal Court Affirms Death Sentences for Five Offa Bank Robbery Convicts

Published

on

By

The Court of Appeal sitting in Ilorin, Kwara State has affirmed the death sentences passed on five 2018 Offa robbery convicts.

The court dismissed their appeals as lacking merit.

The Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) in the state, Mohammed Akande, who witnessed the proceedings, said that the three Appeal Court judges unanimously agreed on the judgement and affirmed the verdict of the state High Court condemning the five persons to death by hanging.

“The Court of Appeal, Ilorin Division comprising of Hon. Justice Ridwan Maiwada Abdullahi JCA, Hon. Justice Gabriel Kolawole JCA and Hon. Justice Abdul Dogo today, Friday affirmed the judgment of Hon. Justice H. A. Saleeman of the Kwara State High Court, that sentenced the Appellants: Niyi Ogundiran, Salawu Azeez, Ibikunle Ogunleye, Ayoade Akinnibosun and Adeola Abraham to death by hanging for the involvement in the Offa Bank Robbery”.

Another official of the Court also said that the appellate court rejected all the grounds of appeal filed by the convicts and ordered their immediate return to prison custody.

“The court dismissed all their grounds of appeal and upheld their convictions. They have been taken back to prison,” the official said.

The official said that the arguments raised at the Court of Appeal were unconvincing and may not succeed if repeated at the apex court.

It is recalled that Ayoade Akinnibosun, Azeez Salahudeen, Niyi Ogundiran, Ibikunle Ogunleye and Adeola Abraham were convicted of armed robbery, illegal possession of firearms and culpable homicide.

A sixth suspect, Michael Adikwu, a retired police officer, died in custody before the commencement of the trial.

At least 32 people were killed, including nine police officers, two of whom were women, making it one of the deadliest bank robberies in Nigeria’s history.

Justice Haleemah Saleeman of the Kwara State High Court had earlier sentenced the five convicts to death by hanging after a trial that lasted about six years and attracted nationwide attention.

In her judgment, which lasted over four hours, Justice Salman held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

She said the convicts “acted contrary to the law and allowed their connections with those in power at the time to lead them astray”.

In addition to the death sentence, the trial court also sentenced them to three years’ imprisonment for illegal possession of firearms, in line with provisions of Nigeria’s penal laws.

Lead prosecution counsel, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), described the appellate court’s decision as thorough and well considered, despite the prolonged delays that characterised the trial.

On the defence side, Abdullah Jimba, counsel to one of the convicts, said that preparations were underway to pursue a final appeal at the Supreme Court.

 

Continue Reading

Trending