Connect with us

News

States Should Get Assets Recovered From Ex-Governors- EFCC Chairman Says

Published

on

Abdulrasheed Bawa, chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), says it is the position of the law that recovered assets should be returned to the victims it was looted from.

A controversy on whether the state or federal government should be the recipient of repatriated loot sprung up after the United Kingdom made a commitment to return £4.2 million loot recovered from James Ibori, former governor of Delta state, to the federal government.

Abubakar Malami, attorney-general of the federation, said the recovered loot will be channelled into federal projects.

However, stakeholders including Femi Falana, human rights lawyer, argued that the Ibori loot in question should be returned to Delta since it was taken from the coffers of the state.

According to Falana, the federal government has no locus standi to decide how the recovered money is spent.

On his part, Ifeanyi Okowa, governor of Delta, said if the money cannot be sent to the state’s coffers, it should be spent on projects in the state.

However, speaking on the issue of asset recovery when he featured on One-on-One, a programme on Nigerian Television Authority (NTA), Bawa said the law states that assets recovered from former governors should be returned to the affected states.

“When it comes to this issue of recovered assets, the provision of the law is very clear. There are victims of these crimes. Somebody has gotten somebody’s money fraudulently and assets are recovered from that individual. Of course, it will be returned to him (the victim),” Bawa was quoted as saying in EFCC ALERT.

“State government lost money through its former governor; assets are recovered from that former governor. Of course, it will be returned to the state. Other assets that are recovered for the federal government, it will be returned to the federal government.

“But there are stages. Issues of identification, tracing, and recovery of assets are there; all these are stages. Of course, before trial is concluded in court where matters are charged, those assets recovered through interim forfeiture are managed by us.

“And the EFCC has a full-fledged directorate of assets forfeiture and management that manages these assets. Normally, we engage estate managers to manage these assets, and proceeds from the rents are kept in an account with the Central Bank of Nigeria. And then at the end of the trial, after the pronouncement of the court, whosoever is the victim, needs to be restituted. And if what the law says is that it should be sold, then after the sale of the assets, the proceeds, if it is for the federal government, will be put in the consolidated revenue fund.”

Commenting on the delay in the prosecution of cases, Bawa said the creation of special courts will not serve as an absolute solution.

He explained that some of the issues that cause delay in the prosecution of cases, like “defence counsel trying to delay trials unnecessarily”, are unavoidable.

The anti-graft czar, however, suggested that the employment of new judges will help ease the task.

 

News

Police Drag 83-Year-Old To Court for Alleged Land Grabbing, Death Threats

Published

on

By

The police have arraigned an 83-year-old man, Idowu Olowo, before an Ile-Ife Magistrates’ Court in Osun, over alleged land grabbing.

The defendant whose address was not provided, is facing charges bordering on land grabbing, forcible entry, threat to life and stealing.

The prosecutor, ASP Kehinde Ojugbele, told the court that the defendant committed the offences sometimes in 2025 about 11.00a.m at Kajola, Onikanga village, Ifetedo.

He added that the defendant forcibly entered into a land belonging to Ajetunmobi Adeniyi and threatened his life for the purpose of land grabbing.

According to him, the defendant sometimes in February 2025 at about 11.00a.m at Kajola, Onikanga village in Ifetedo, stole the farm produce including Cocoa fruits, kolanut fruits and palm kernel valued at N5 million, property of Adeniyi.

The prosecutor stated that the offences contravened Sections 81, 86 and 390 of the Criminal Code, Cap 34 Vol.11, Laws of Osun, 2002.

The defendant, however, pleaded not guilty.

The defendant’s counsel, Mrs Sidikat Salawu, applied for the bail on liberal terms, pledging that he would not jump bail.

The Magistrate, Mrs Abosede Sarumi, granted the defendant bail in the sum of N250,000 with two sureties in like sum.

Sarumi added the sureties must swear to affidavit of means, reside within the court jurisdiction, produce three years tax certificate and recent passport photographs.

She ordered that the defendant be remanded at Area Commander Police Station pending the perfection of his bail.

The court adjourned the case until March 2, for further mention.

(NAN)

Continue Reading

News

Anambra Govt Seals 200 Shops For Obeying Sit-at-Home Order

Published

on

By

Officials in the Onitsha South Local Government Area of Anambra State have sealed over 200 shops at the Bridge Head Market for failing to comply with the state’s directive to ignore the Monday “sit-at-home” order.

The affected shops, located across six market lines, were found under lock and key during a compliance monitoring exercise by the LG authorities on Monday.

It was gathered that there were no commercial activities in the area when the LG monitoring visited, as the traders reportedly refused to open their shops for business despite government directives mandating the resumption of normal trading activities.

The enforcement exercise was led by the Chairman of Onitsha South Local Government Area, Emeka Orji, and the Secretary of the Council, Paul Onuachalla.

During the operation, entrances to the affected market lines were sealed by the LG monitoring team, and new padlocks were secured to prevent access to the closed shops.

Speaking to journalists on Tuesday, Orji described the traders’ actions as unfortunate and counterproductive, particularly at a time when the state government is working to restore normal commercial activities across Anambra State.

According to him, there are strong indications that the allocations of the affected shops may be revoked and reassigned to other traders, pending the outcome of a full investigation by the authorities.

“He said, “It is sad and unfortunate that while the state government is making concerted efforts to revive economic activities in Anambra State on Mondays, some individuals are bent on sabotaging those efforts.

“Other markets and shops in Onitsha were open for business, but traders at the Bridge Head Market chose to shut down their operations.

“This amounts to economic sabotage against the state, and we will no longer tolerate such actions. The affected shops will remain sealed until next Monday. If the traders fail to comply by reopening for business on that day, the closure will be extended indefinitely.”

Also addressing journalists, the Secretary of the Council, Onuachalla, stated that the traders’ actions could constitute serious offences, including economic sabotage and related crimes under the law.

Onuachalla further disclosed that the shop allocations of the affected traders may be revoked in line with existing laws.

“This action amounts to economic sabotage against Anambra State and could be interpreted as aiding and abetting unlawful activities. As a council, we cannot treat such matters with kid gloves.

“We expected the traders to learn from the earlier closure of the Onitsha Main Market. However, they apparently believed they could disregard the government’s directive without consequences. They must now face the full weight of the law, and there will be no compromise.

“As we speak, the allocations of those shops are under review. Under the law, the government retains overriding authority over public property, and such allocations can be revoked in the public interest,” he added.

Continue Reading

News

Police Silent Amid Reports Of IGP Egbetokun’s Alledged Removal

Published

on

By

Reports have surfaced via activist Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters alleging that President Bola Tinubu has ordered the removal of IGP Kayode Egbetokun.

Sowore claimed that Egbetokun had been replaced by a senior officer currently serving at the Force Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department, FCIID, in Lagos.

While these reports claim the development is “confirmed” by internal sources, both the Presidency and the Nigeria Police Force have yet to issue an official public statement.

He, however, did not provide official confirmation to back the claim.

As of the time of filing this report, there was no statement from the Presidency or the Nigeria Police Force confirming the development.

Efforts to get a confirmation from Force Public Relations Officer, Benjamin Hundeyin, were not successful. Hundeyin did not answer calls placed to his phone.

He subsequently sent a message asking that a text message be forwarded to him, assuring that he would respond.

However, as at press time, he had yet to reply.

Sowore has repeatedly questioned Egbetokun’s tenure, arguing that the police chief ought to have exited office upon attaining the mandatory retirement age of 60.

President Bola Tinubu appointed Egbetokun as acting Inspector-General of Police in October 2023, pending confirmation by the National Assembly.

The appointment took effect on October 31, 2023.

Following controversy over the IGP’s tenure, the Federal Government sponsored an amendment to the Police Act providing for a single four-year term for an Inspector-General of Police, irrespective of age or years of service.

The provision allows Egbetokun to remain in office until October 2027.

 

Continue Reading

Trending