Connect with us

News

Son in law threatens mother in law over custody of defiled kids

Published

on

Unending controversy over alleged defilement of two minors as the father in the center of the storm also allegedly disappears with the kids in contempt of court. The NGIJ team of OLUWASEGUN ABIFARIN and OLAWALE ABIDEEN write

Since Monday 3 June 2019, Queen Elizabeth Iluyomade, a widow, has been crying and praying to wake up from her nightmare. A call she received on her phone that evening shattered her peace as the caller broke the news of an ‘okada’ accident in Ile Zik, near Ikeja, that took the life of her first daughter Modupe, married to Oluwaseun Olomo, 41, residing on 3, Banire Close, Egbeda, Lagos.

She rushed to the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, LASUTH, Ikeja, but the deed had been done. Modupe is dead. Mrs. Iluyomade wailed; cried bitterly. Then the nightmare began.

Modupe’s death had led to a lot of controversy, suspicion and intrigues before it eventually culminated in a case before Magistrate B.O Osunsanmi of Ikeja Magistrate District, Ogba, Lagos.

Immediately after the burial, Iluyomade, Olomo’s mother-in-law contended that the children (Fiyinfoluwa, 5 and Folakemi, 2) had to reside with her after the death of their mother to stave off the post-death emotional trauma.

After few days with her, she started noticing a strange bowel movement and behavior patterns of the children and decided to carry out medical examination on July 5, 2019 at the General Hospital, Isolo.

While this was on, the “war over the custody of the children” began.

“My opinion was that since Olomo, my son-in-law is an Uber driver, who will not be available to take care of the children, it will be proper to have custody of the children for now,” she said.

Olomo refused and instead allegedly brought members of the Oodua People’s Congress, OPC, to threaten his mother-in-law, and also petition the Police in Zone 2, Onikan, Lagos.

While the dispute was spiraling, Iluyomade approached the Lagos State Office of Public Defender, OPD, concerning the health of the children, from where she was referred to the Mirabel Center at the Lagos State College of Medicine, LASUTH, Ikeja.

The Office of the Public Defender, Lagos State Ministry of Justice was established on July 24, 2000 to provide qualitative legal aid through free representation in court and legal advice to promote respect for rights and freedoms, the law and constitution and to ensure that all persons resident in Lagos State irrespective of means, sex, tribe or religion have access to justice.

Several tests conducted at Mirabel Center later revealed that the two year old Folakemi had been penetrated severally and serially from her vagina and anus.

It was also discovered that the five year old boy, Fiyinfoluwa had been penetrated through his anus.

According the report signed by Dr. Jideuche Onyememnam “and his team” on 7 August, 2019, it was discovered that two-year old Folakemi had an “apparently nominal female extended genital and there was “a generalized hyperemia of genital mycoses” and “bruises on either sides of vestibule is seen”

According to the report, “the hymen is obliterated with rough centered edges and there is easy visualization of the distal, posterior of the virginal canal.”

Dr. Onyememnam concluded the report that “the genital findings are in keeping with frequent blunt penetration/trauma to the vaginal.”

Also, “the anal finding is in keeping with trauma to this region.”

In his interview, Onyememnam found out that the father was “described as being too eager for the clients to return to his house with him.”

After the test, Iluyomade said an alarmed team advised her to go and bring the other child for examination too.

The result of Fiyinfoluwa, examined by Dr. Alagbe Oyedeji, on 14 August, 2019, was not less tragic. The team found out that there was a “reduced anal sphmiriteric bone which revealed healed anal bruises globally.”

Oyedeji concluded that the “anal examination findings on client are consistent with repeated forceful, blunt penetration into his anus.”

Armed with the medical report and the video evidence where the boy allegedly confessed that the act was done by their father, the OPD referred the matter to the Gender Unit of the Lagos State Police Command since according to them, “the matter has morphed into a criminal offence in which Olomo, the father of the children is a prime suspect.”

The confession and the suspicion, according to Iluyomade were reinforced by the fact that the kids live with their parents only; there was no house help; the mother will leave early for work and the kids will be left with the father who is at home.

The case, Iluyomade alleged was subjected to a lot of manipulation at the Gender Unit before the Muazu Zubairu, Lagos Commissioner of Police at that time, who ordered the IPO at the Gender Unit, Olakunle Orebe to file “an Action right away”.

Eventually, Iluyomade maintained that when the application for Remand Order was heard, Magistrate Osunsanmi granted the suspect bail, according to her, because “there was no sufficient evidence before her to link the suspect to the crime.”

The Magistrate, also held that the statement for the arrangement of the children filed by the Respondent (Olomo) is more credible and acceptable to the court that filed by the Applicant (Iluyomade).

It also held that the independent investigative report from the Social Work department showed that the Respondent is a responsible man.

Maigstrate Osunsanmi therefore ruled that Olomo be granted the custody of the children while Iluyomade was granted access and visitation right once a month.

The judgment has however sparked fresh controversy as Mrs. Iluyomade is suspecting a lot of foul play and therefore crying for justice.

According to her, “upon inquiries made after the day’s proceedings, I discovered that the IPO Orebe, had altered evidence in his affidavit in support of the remand application, giving evidence contrary to the true facts he told the commissioner of Police. Furthermore, he did not bring the video evidence to the attention of the Honourable court, all which have fuelled my suspicion that the IPO is bent on perverting justice in this case.”

Specifically, Iluyomade petitioned the Lagos Ministry of Justice “to take over and investigate the case involving the defilement, sodomy and abuse of the two minors

She also want the Ministry to “investigate the very suspicious and unclear circumstances of the death of my daughter on the 3 June, 2019 with a view to unravelling the truth.”

Iluyomade also wrote to the Inspector General of Police to investigate the threat to her life by one Benedict Olomo, a Superintendent of Police and DPO of Ilasan Police Station.

According to her, on the 19 August 2019, whey the parties were invited to write their statements at the Lagos Police command, Benedict “suddenly emerged and threatened that he is going to kill me for smearing his family name in the mud…and that he has the power and the means to do that.”

Since then, Iluyomade said he has been receiving “strange calls repeatedly.”

Severally months after her petition and several trips to the Ministry, nothing has been done concerning her case.

But Kayode Oyekanmi, Deputy Director, Public Affairs, Lagos State Ministry of Justice explained that the Ministry must have “done something behind the scene, and advised Mrs. Iluyomade to go back to the OPD for further action.

On the allegation against the police, the Lagos State Police Public Relation Officer, PPRO, Bala Elkanah, a Deputy Superintendent of Police, explained a case in court has gone beyond the police.

He added the Iluyomade’s petition against the infraction by Olakunle Orebe and the threat to life by Benedict Olomo should have been addressed to the Lagos CP instead of the IG.

“If the petition had been directed to the CP, I could have been in a position to monitor the people involved in the investigation and give an answer. You said the man involved is a SP; who is a SP before a CP?” Elkanah said.

Frank Mba, the Force PRO in Abuja did not pick the calls made to him and did not respond to text messages sent to him.

All calls made to Orebe on 0816-397-4001 and his boss at the Gender Unit office, Mrs Williams on 0802-300-7799 last week were not answered.

Another twist is that two weeks ago, when Mrs. Iluyomade went to check the children as ordered by the court, Olomo has vacated his Egbeda address with the children without telling the court and Iluyomade in defiance of court order which granted her access to the children once a month.

She also alleged that all calls made to his known phone numbers did not go through last week.

A disillusioned Mrs. Iluyoade went back to the OPD last week to relay her predicament, wondering while the body did not appeal the judgment of the Magistrate in the first instance.

Mahmud Taiwo Hassan, OPD’s Head of Public Affairs advised the woman to come back to the center with all her documents for a possible fresh proceedings especially on what looked like a contempt of court.

A lawyer in the Center also counselled that the next moved would be to approach the court afresh.

With no concrete response from the OPD, she has approached her lawyer to file an appeal or a fresh charge of jumping bail against Olomo.

Meanwhile, Oluwaseun Olomo, the man at the center of the storm declined to speak to our correspondent last week and instead referred him to his lawyer, J. Fadesere Esq and Co who insisted that his client has not run foul of the law.

According to him, the judgment was that Iluyomade must got the clearance from the Care Officer at Agege Local Government, who will call Olomo before Iluyomade can access the kids.

Iluyomade however countered that the instruction of the Magistrate was that she should only report to the Care Officer if Olomo denied her access.

On the present abode of Olomo, Fadesere said “he could not divulge such information.”

Iluyomade added that she had been calling the Care Officer severally to report the infraction, but the calls were not picked.

Her trip to the Agege office yielded no fruit as the office was said to have gone on a seminar.

But Mrs. Grace Ketefe, Executive Director of the CeceYara Child Advocacy Centre that provides a child-friendly safe environment for children to disclose sexual abuse maintained that it is the culture of impunity that is fuelling the present growing cases of child molestation and defilement across the country.

She urged Iluyomade to go on appeal against the judgment at the magistrate court.

A distraught Iluyomade still believe she will get justice.

“I cannot lose my daughter in a very suspicious circumstances like that and now don’t even know the whereabouts of my grandchildren after the facts on ground. It is sad. This is pure wickedness and crass injustice. Nigerians should come to my aid,” the distraught woman said.

“My life and that of my family are under threat. My life and that of my children are not safe, Nigerians must come to my rescue,” Iluyomade added.

While she waits and hopes, the nightmare continues.

Advertisement

News

Plateau Crisis: Tinubu Summons Gov Mutfwang, Orders Security Crackdown

Published

on

By

President Bola Tinubu on Tuesday met with top security and intelligence chiefs to review the recent wave of violence in Plateau State and has summoned Governor Caleb Mutfwang to Abuja for urgent consultations.

The attack, which occurred on Sunday in Angwan Rukuba community, Jos North Local Government Area, left at least 28 people dead and many others injured.

Briefing journalists in Abuja, Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, described the incident as regrettable but emphasised that it does not indicate a breakdown of security.

He added that security agencies have launched clearance operations to prevent reprisal attacks and reiterated the Federal Government’s deep concern and condolences to the people of Plateau State.

According to the minister, the President’s meeting with security chiefs aims to assess the situation and implement decisive measures toward a lasting solution.

He said, “A few hours ago, His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, held a high-level meeting with the nation’s top security and intelligence chiefs to review the situation and take further decisive steps towards arriving at a lasting solution. Following this meeting, the Executive Governor of Plateau State, Caleb Manasseh Mutfwang, has been invited by President Tinubu to further deliberate and chart a coordinated path towards lasting peace and security.

“The outcome of the meeting between President Tinubu and Governor Mutfwang will be made public in due course. These actions underscore the seriousness with which the Federal Government is treating this matter and its firm commitment to ensuring that all necessary actions are taken promptly and effectively.”

The Minister also stressed, ”While this incident is deeply regrettable, it is important to place it in context. Plateau State has, over time, experienced localised security challenges linked to communal tensions and criminal activities. What occurred does not represent a breakdown of national security, but rather a criminal act within a known conflict-prone area—one that is being actively and decisively addressed by the authorities.

“The federal government has directed all security agencies to ensure that those responsible for this heinous act are identified, apprehended, and brought to justice. “There will be no safe haven for criminal elements anywhere in Nigeria. Ongoing operations are already generating actionable intelligence, and we are confident that those behind this attack will be held accountable.

“Let me reassure all Nigerians that the security situation in Plateau State is under control and is being actively managed. The Federal Government remains fully committed to protecting lives and property across the country, and we will continue to strengthen our intelligence capabilities, operational readiness, and inter-agency coordination to stay ahead of emerging threats.

“We urge all citizens to remain calm, law-abiding, and to cooperate fully with security agencies. It is also important to avoid the spread of unverified information that could heighten tensions or undermine ongoing efforts to restore peace.

“Nigeria’s unity remains strong, and we must not allow criminal elements to divide our communities. The Federal Government will continue to act decisively, in collaboration with the Plateau State Government and all relevant stakeholders, to ensure lasting peace and security.

“Nigeria will not yield to fear. We will protect our people, and we will prevail.”

The Minister also exonerated the security agencies, saying that they took swift action to contain the situation.

He said, “Let me assure Nigerians that security agencies responded immediately to the incident. Troops under Operation Enduring Peace were rapidly mobilised to the scene following distress calls.

“The military and other security agencies cordoned off the affected area, secured key access routes, and launched targeted search-and-clearance operations to track down the perpetrators. “These swift actions ensured that the situation was quickly contained and prevented further escalation.

“This response is part of a broader and sustained Federal Government security architecture in Plateau State and the wider North-Central region. The Nigerian Armed Forces have continued to carry out clearance operations and intelligence-led missions across vulnerable communities following attacks recorded in recent months. Reinforced surveillance and troop deployments have also been implemented in high-risk areas, supported by joint military-police patrols and strengthened rapid response mechanisms. “These coordinated efforts are designed to neutralise threats proactively and maintain stability.”

He also added, “At the national level, the Federal Government remains resolute in its commitment to security, as demonstrated through ongoing targeted military offensives and strategic deployments aimed at dismantling criminal and insurgent networks across the country. These efforts reflect a comprehensive and evolving approach to safeguarding lives and property.

“The Plateau State Government has also taken decisive and complementary measures in coordination with federal authorities. A 48-hour curfew was imposed in Jos North immediately after the incident to stabilise the security environment and support ongoing operations. The state government continues to work closely with security agencies to prevent reprisals, restore calm, and facilitate investigations.”

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu’s $6bn External Borrowing Request Gets Senate Nod

Published

on

By

The Nigerian Senate has approved President Bola Tinubu’s request for a $6 billion external loan.

The approval was granted approximately three to four hours after the request letters were read by the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio on the Senate floor.

The red chamber of the National Assembly approved the loans after the presentation and consideration of a report by the Senator Aliyu Wamakko-led Committee on Local and Foreign Debts.

JomogNews had reported earlier that President Tinubu’s latest loan request was contained in two separate letters addressed to the President of the Senate, which were read during plenary on Tuesday.

In the first letter, Tinubu requested the approval to establish a structured total return swap (TRS) external financing programme of up to $5 billion with First Abu Dhabi Bank of the United Arab Emirates.

The President, in the second letter, also asked the Senate to approve a $1 billion UK export finance loan facility arranged by Citibank, London branch.

He said that the loan would be used for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Lagos Port Complex and Tin Can Island Port.

Continue Reading

News

When 8 million Customers Trust You, Safety Cannot Be an Afterthought

Published

on

By

Nigeria’s digital banking revolution is raising the stakes for consumer trust. The question is whether the industry is rising to meet them.

 

Nigeria’s relationship with digital banking has changed almost beyond recognition in a decade. Where cash once dominated every transaction, from the roadside market to the corporate boardroom, mobile apps, instant transfers and USSD codes have reshaped how tens of millions of Nigerians interact with their money every single day.

 

The figures speak for themselves: point-of-sale transactions surged to a record N18 trillion in 2024, a 69 per cent increase from the year before, and the number of POS terminals in operation more than doubled to 5.5 million. Mobile banking is now the most widely used digital financial service in the country, with four in five users having accessed it within any given 90-day window.

 

This is, by any honest measure, an extraordinary story of financial inclusion and technological adoption. But it is an incomplete story if told without its other half.

 

Behind the growth curves and transaction volumes, a quieter and more troubling story has been unfolding. According to the 2024 Nigeria Consumer Protection Survey published by Innovations for Poverty Action, nearly one in four digital financial services users reported experiencing unexpected fees, charges or fraud attempts in the past year. Of those who encountered a problem, only half sought any form of formal redress. That silence is not apathy. It is the sound of eroded confidence: customers who have concluded that raising a complaint is unlikely to produce results.

 

The fraud data from the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System tells the same story from a different angle. Actual losses to digital payment fraud rose to N52.26 billion in 2024, a figure inflated significantly by a single N31.1 billion incident involving one institution but still representing a 196 per cent increase in fraud losses over five years, even as the number of individual cases declined.

 

The decline in case counts is not reassurance enough. It suggests that while fraudsters are making fewer attempts, they are making each one count considerably more.

By channel, e-commerce and internet banking remain the most exposed, followed by point-of-sale, mobile and web platforms.

 

The most common technique is social engineering, which requires no sophisticated technology at all. It requires only a convincing conversation and a customer who does not know what to guard against. Insider abuse, where bank staff are complicit in fraud, is identified by NIBSS as the single greatest structural threat to the sector.

 

That is a sobering finding, and one that no institution should read past quickly.

What this data collectively points to is a gap that the industry must confront honestly. Nigeria’s digital banking infrastructure has expanded at speed. The consumer protection architecture that should travel alongside it has not always kept pace.

 

Convenience and safety are not natural enemies, but they require deliberate and sustained design to coexist. Left to grow at different speeds, they create precisely the conditions that fraudsters, rogue actors and complacent institutions exploit.

 

The encouraging news is that the gap is closing. Nigeria exited the Financial Action Task Force’s grey list in 2025, a signal that the country’s financial system has materially strengthened its safeguards. The CBN’s 2024 rollout of risk-based cybersecurity frameworks for deposit money banks formalised the standard of care that institutions are required to demonstrate.

 

Regulatory enforcement actions in 2024, including reported industry penalties totalling over N15 billion, have underscored that consumer protection is a compliance obligation with real and immediate consequence. The industry is being held to a higher standard, and that is the right direction.

 

Within institutions themselves, the most effective safeguards are often the ones customers never see. The strongest security infrastructure operates silently in the background: monitoring account behaviour in real time, identifying anomalies before they become losses and intervening before a suspicious transaction completes rather than after.

 

This is not glamorous work, but it is the work that matters most. A customer who never has to report a fraud incident has been protected more effectively than one who was offered a sympathetic apology after the damage was done.

Union Bank’s experience illustrates what this balance looks like in practice.

 

According to the bank’s full-year 2025 customer experience data, its digital channels recorded strong customer satisfaction scores across all platforms: UnionMobile achieved a customer satisfaction score of 87 per cent and a net promoter score of 77, while the USSD channel (*826#) returned scores of 82 per cent and 70 respectively.

 

These are not numbers that emerge from convenience alone. They reflect what customers value above all else when they transact digitally: the confidence that the experience will be safe, seamless and complete.

 

That confidence is built through sustained investment in security infrastructure, proactive monitoring and an institutional culture that treats customer protection as a core value rather than a compliance line item.

 

It is a culture Union Bank articulates through its ICARE values, where the commitment to being customer and community-focused is not a policy position but a founding organisational principle, reinforced consistently from the moment any member of staff joins the bank.

 

In March, as institutions across Nigeria marked World Consumer Rights Day, Union Bank reaffirmed to its staff the responsibility that every individual within the organisation carries to uphold the rights and dignity of the customers it serves. It is the kind of internal commitment that rarely makes headlines, but that ultimately determines the quality of every customer interaction that does.

 

Trust is the only currency in banking that cannot be manufactured on demand. It is built over time, through consistent behaviour, through systems that protect customers before they know they need protecting, and through institutions willing to be accountable when they fall short. Nigeria’s digital banking revolution has done extraordinary things for financial access and economic participation. Its next chapter must be defined by what it does for financial safety. The two are not in competition. In the long run, they are, in every meaningful sense, the same thing.

 

Continue Reading

Trending