Connect with us

News

Amotekun: ”It’s sad people of Northern extraction are never happy when we want to organise ourselves on regional basis” – Itse Sagay reacts

Published

on

Professor Itse Sagay, the chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) has said that it is very sad that people of Northern extraction are never happy when Southerners want to organise themselves on regional basis.

Sagay who is a staunch Pro-Buhari government official, said this while reacting to the comment made by the Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, who on Tuesday January 14th, declared Amotekun, the newly created security outfit by SouthWest governors, as an illegal entity.

Sagay in an interview with Daily Independent, said Malami was only speak out of prejudice. He wondered why Amotekun can be described as illegal when it is the same laws that created it that was used in to create the Northern security outfits, Hisbah police and the Civilian Joint Taskforce. He stressed that Malami was only expressing his personal prejudice and not the law when he declared Amotekun illegal.

Read excepts from his interview below

The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) has described Operation Amotekun, a security arrangement put together by South-West governors as illegal. He said the governors should have consulted him so that he can give them legal advice on whether they can go ahead or not. As a legal expert, what is your perspective on this? 

I believe that the governors have no duty to consult him. He is Attorney- General of the Federation, not Attorney-General of South-West states. The state governors have their own Attorney-Generals who are equally as qualified as Malami is. So, if this is part of the conspiracy that anything that smacks of regional arrangements or organisation offends some people who believe there has to be direct federal rule in every nook and cranny of the country, that is own misery. But it has nothing to do with the law. As far as i am concerned, Malami is just expressing his personal prejudice, it has nothing to with the law. The Amotekun people are not paramilitary organisation. They are to apprehend those committing crimes and report to the police or they themselves can exercise their rights of citizen’s arrest which we all can do as individuals. I can arrest somebody who I suspect has committed a crime. 

So, the AGF is just speaking out of pure prejudice and it is very sad that people of Northern extraction are never happy when we want to organise ourselves on regional basis. I don’t understand that. if you don’t want to organise yourselves, how can you stop others from doing it? It is pure prejudice and it has nothing to do with the law. The governors have no duty whatsoever to consult him and he shouldn’t aggrandise himself and arrogate to himself powers that he doesn’t have. I think the governors should just ignore him and carry on with what they are doing. If he feels aggrieved that people in some parts off the country are trying to secure themselves against crime, he can go to court to challenge it. That arrogant authority that he can dictate to states is very insulting. 

Since the pronouncement by the Minister, there has been this debate about why Sharia Police in some Northern states popularly called Hisbah should be legal while Amotekun was declared illegal. Is there any difference between the two? 

In a sense, they have the same legal status; in the sense that each one is a creation of the state and not of the federal government. It is a very good point to raise and others have also raised the issue of the Civilian JTF in the North East. Those people are organised to identify Boko Haram terrorists and alert the military. When necessary, they defend themselves against the terrorists. Nobody is complaining because it is for a good purpose. Let me make a general statement here. In law, if something is not expressly prohibited, then that thing can be done legitimately. There is no law, either in the Police or any other act, is there a prohibition of one state or many states coming together to organise the promotion of the security of the peoples of the state. The primary duty of the state is the protection of the security of the people. It is in the section 14 (2) of the constitution. That is their primary duty and this falls not only on the federal government but on all states. If you look at the constitution, the powers are equal in that sense. The federal covers the whole country and the states cover their territorial areas. They can make laws for good governance which is also provided for in the constitution. What I am saying is that the concept of Amotekun is not banned and if it is not prohibited, it can be legitimately embarked upon. 

On the non-legal side, if you think about our security, the insecurity challenge which is confronting Nigeria now is so high everywhere. People are afraid of traveling by road or going out at nights and so on. I think we should welcome any effort by a group or individual state to help to secure lives and property and improve the security situation in the country. . 

 It is the duty of the federal government to collaborate with them to improve the security of everybody in the country. The state government also has a duty to protect the lives and security of everybody so, several state governments can decide to exercise that duty together collectively and the federal government should assist them. So, there is nothing illegal at all about Amotekun. If they now want to carry arms such as AK-47 and other powerful arms aside dane guns, at that stage, they will need federal permission. But if they are not doing that, and they are not an armed body in the modern sense, they do not need any other authority to operate 

An aide of the Minister yesterday said they wonder if you have any personal scores to settle with him given your opposition to some of his actions in the last few days. Do you have anything personal against Malami? 

I want to advise the gentleman not to personalise issues of public interests. The position of Attorney-General is a very important one and its authority affects all of us. So, when he as a lawyer makes a statement or takes any decision that one considers wrong, there is nothing wrong in expressing a contrary view. That is what a debate is all about in a democratic society. It is not personal. Personally, I like Malami as a person. It is just unfortunate that he issued statements one after the other within a short period and the media wanted me to express my views on the issues and I don’t agree with the steps Malami took on the two occasions. I have nothing against him; in fact, I’m favorably disposed towards him because in a sense, we are all working together in the same theatre. So, it’s not correct for anyone to say I am having any personal scores to settle with him and it is wrong for anyone to interpret my objective views on statements issued by Malami in that light. It is not right. I can call Malami now and chat with him on issues of interests to the country. I have nothing personal against him.

Source: City News

Advertisement

News

Electoral Act 2026: 2-Year Prison Term For RECs Over Result Manipulation

Published

on

By

The National Assembly has officially rolled out the Electoral Act 2026, introducing aggressive reforms aimed at securing the 2027 general elections.

Key highlights include a two-year prison sentence for any INEC Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) who refuses to release essential election documents, and the launch of a dedicated fund to bolster the commission’s financial independence.

These changes, detailed by Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele on Sunday, come amid heavy pushback from opposition parties. Critics argue that the new rules specifically those regarding candidate primaries, campaign spending, and election schedules are unfairly structured to benefit the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Bamidele’s attempt to highlight the benefits of the electoral reform comes barely 24 hours after opposition parties fumed that provisions in the 2026 Act on primaries, campaign funding, and election timelines tilted the playing field in favour of the ruling All Progressives Congress.

While the Presidency and the APC have defended the amendments as necessary reforms to deepen democracy and strengthen electoral integrity, opposition figures insisted the changes were skewed to weaken political competition.

The Senate leader, however, argued that there were several merits that many Nigerians were not considering in the new Electoral Act.

He said, “The new electoral governance framework equally mandates the INEC to deploy a Bimodal Voters Accreditation System; recommend two-year jail imprisonment for the Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) who withholds vital documents; establish an electronic register of voters and review campaign funds upward for different elective offices.”

The Electoral Bill 2026 was harmonised by both chambers of the National Assembly — particularly over contentious Clause 60(3) — before it was transmitted to President Bola Tinubu for assent to avert any constitutional crisis in the build-up to the next general election.

The President signed the bill into law within 24 hours of its passage, completing what lawmakers described as a painstaking two-year process of recrafting Nigeria’s electoral framework.

Although some civil society organisations questioned the speed of the presidential assent, the Senate leadership maintained that the process had been inclusive and exhaustive.

According to Bamidele, the making of the new regime “is a collective work that involves nearly all critical stakeholders. The National Assembly worked with such different stakeholders as OAGF, CSOs, INEC and our development partners, among others, before we eventually completed the process.

“As we were making progress, the stakeholders too were making their input, and all the inputs were incorporated in the Act.

“In view of the time constraint we are facing now, I do not believe the Executive requires days or weeks to review it before assent since we all contributed to it. Its outcome is not a unilateral effort of the parliament, but of Nigerians at large,” he stated.

Under Section 3 of the new law, a dedicated fund has been established for INEC to ensure financial autonomy, operational stability and administrative continuity.

The provision also mandates that election funds be released at least six months before a general election.

With this measure, Bamidele said INEC would operate with greater independence and quicker corrective powers, including expanded authority to review questionable result declarations made under duress or procedural violations.

He noted that the new framework is “designed to strengthen institutional independence, enhance transparency in election management, improve technological integration, and reinforce accountability mechanisms in the country’s electoral system.”

Section 60(3) now makes electronic transmission of results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal mandatory, while Section 60(6) prescribes “a six-month imprisonment or a fine of N500,000 or both against any presiding officer who willfully frustrates the electronic transmission of election results.”

er rattles NNPC, PDP heads to court over FCT poll, INEC officials risk jail and other top stories
Bamidele said, “This provision is consistent with the public demands. It also stipulates another measure of consequence if any presiding officer refuses to electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to IREV.

“We must equally understand that iRev is not a collation platform. It was designed to enhance transparency in our electoral process. An electronic collating system is a project that requires its own planning,” Bamidele clarified.

He explained further that the law conditionally permitted a resort to Form EC8A where electronic transmission failed due to communication challenges, as prescribed by INEC.

In a move aimed at curbing administrative bottlenecks and electoral impunity, Section 74(1) mandates a REC to release a certified true copy of any requested document within 24 hours after payment. Failure to comply attracts a minimum imprisonment of two years without the option of a fine.

Similarly, Section 72(2) provides that a certified true copy of a court order shall suffice for swearing in any candidate declared a winner by the court where INEC fails or neglects to issue a certificate of return.

Under Section 125(1-2), the Act stiffens penalties against vote-buying, impersonation and result manipulation, recommending a two-year imprisonment or a fine ranging between N500,000 and N2m both upon conviction.

Unlike the repealed 2022 Electoral Act, the new law phases out indirect primaries, retaining only direct and consensus primaries under Section 84(1-2) to broaden participation and curb the monetisation of party delegates.

Section 77(1-7) further mandates political parties to maintain a digital register of members, issue membership cards, and submit such registers to INEC at least 21 days before primaries, congresses or conventions.

A political party “shall not use any other register for party primaries, congresses and conventions than the register submitted to the INEC.

“Besides, any political party that fails to submit the membership register within the stipulated time shall not be eligible to field a candidate for that election.

“These are indeed consequential restraint measures that will deepen internal democracy and reduce the monetisation of politics in the country,” Bamidele said.

The new regime also reviews the spending limits for elective offices under Section 92(1-8).

Bamidele said, “The presidential spending cap has been raised from N5bn to N10bn; governorship from N1bn to N3bn; Senate from N500m to N1bn; House of Representatives from N70m to N250m; House of Assembly from N30m to N100m; Area Council from N30m to N60m; and councillorship from N5m to N10m.”

Other notable provisions include gender-sensitive queue arrangements in areas where culture requires separation of men and women, support mechanisms for persons with visual impairment, and a N10m fine for political parties that fail to submit accurate audited returns within the stipulated period.

Summing up the impact of the reforms, the Senate leader declared: “The Electoral Act, 2026, represents a consolidation and refinement of the country’s electoral governance framework. In all, the Act seeks to enhance electoral credibility, reduce disputes, and strengthen democratic governance in Nigeria.

“The Act emphasises financial and operational independence of INEC; technological integration with procedural safeguards; transparency in collation and declaration; stricter penalties for electoral offences and stronger regulation of political parties.”

 

Continue Reading

News

Two Soldiers Killed As ISWAP Raids Military Base In Adamawa

Published

on

By

ISWAP insurgents launched a lethal raid on the Nigerian Army’s Garahamojili camp in Adamawa State last Tuesday, resulting in a 20-minute gun battle that killed two soldiers.

This incident was reported by Sahel security analyst Brant Philip via his X handle.

 

According to the report, the insurgents overran the camp, set it ablaze and destroyed three military vehicles.

They also allegedly carted away weapons and ammunition during the assault.

ISWAP claimed the attack was carried out as part of its recently launched “Burn the Camps” offensive.

According to the post, this would mark the first time the group has targeted a Nigerian Army camp in Adamawa State.

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Couple Kidnapped, One Shot In Ondo Estate Attack

Published

on

By

Gunmen suspected to be kidnappers have abducted a couple from their residence in the Iluabo area of Akure North Local Government, Ondo State.

During the attack, which occurred in the early hours of Saturday, February 21, 2026, the assailants shot one person before seizing the victims.

The gunmen had stormed Olaribigba Estate in the community when they whisked Mr Jamiu Olawale and his wife into the bush.

Following the development, which has created tension in the agrarian community, residents protested and barricaded the road leading to the community over the incessant kidnappings and insecurity in the community.

According to sources, the couple had arrived at their residence in an ash-coloured Toyota Camry when they were attacked by the gunmen, who lay in ambush for them.

During the incident, a neighbour of the abducted couple, Patrick Ilumaro, who was seated in front of his residence, was shot by the gunmen while fleeing from the community.

A neighbour of the victims revealed that Ilumaro was swiftly rushed to an undisclosed medical facility where he is currently receiving medical treatment.

While confirming the incident, the Ondo State Police Command disclosed that tactical teams as well as conventional operatives have been deployed to the community.

In a statement issued by the Police Public Relations Officer, Abayomi Jimoh, the operatives are already combing the axis in an effort to rescue the victims and apprehend the perpetrators.

“Concerted efforts are ongoing to ensure the safe return of the abducted persons and bring those responsible to justice.

“Members of the public are urged to remain calm and go about their lawful activities. Meanwhile, the Command urges them to provide credible and actionable information that may assist in the investigation to the nearest police station.”

Continue Reading

Trending